The Fascinating Process of Self Liberation under Common Law

lamare's picture

In the past months, David Wilcock posted an epic work on Financial Tyranny. One of the most interesting parts of that story is a lawsuit against the central banking system that has been filed by Neil Keenan and Keith Scott, a story that had been covered by Benjamin Fulford for quite some time already.

 

When I investigated this story further, I found out that current International Civil law and thus all the nations operating under this jurisdiction (including the corporate US government) ultimately are legally nothing but vassals of the Vatican. In other words: (virtually) all nations are legally operated as (de-facto) corporations under the jurisdiction of the Vatican. And as we will see, that gives some very interesting possibilities that may offer some solutions to the problems we are facing.

 

The story starts with the Keenan lawsuit, which uses a powerful commercial lien process under Common Law. One of the advisors in that process is Winston Shrout, who is considered to be an expert in this field. In an interview with Wilcock, Shrout referred to the Bible as his source for the legal processes he was using, but Shrout was not aware of any books people may read for more information.

 

So, I went looking on the internet what I could find, and I found the book "Pied Pipers of Babylon" by Verl K. Speer, which goes into the history and fundamental principles of Common Law, the law system used by the Anglo-Saxons in England. He claims that this system originates from the Israelites, which migrated to Northern Europe and that it is the same system one can find in the Bible.

 

Another part of this story, is the process talked about by a fellow named Drake. He talks about returning the US to common law before Law Enforcement agencies in the US will perform mass arrests of the bankers in the US. In this process, juries are formed (an important feature of common law) in various states, which file some paperwork by which the states declare their independence of the corporate Washington government and return to their original constitution and bill of rights.

The flags of the Dutch Batavian Republic (source)

Because of the intriguing nature of this process, I started studying the history of our own constitution and found out that the 1798 constitution of the Batavian Republic is the only Dutch constitution that has been lawfully ratified by the people under common law. All later ones, including the 1801 version under Napoleon, were either illegal or not ratified under the authority of the people but under the authority of someone else. Interestingly, the constitution OF the Batavian Republic (and the 1801 one) were the only constitutions OF The Netherlands. ALL the later constitutions are constitutions FOR The Netherlands and thus OF someone else....

 

Further investigations revealed that the authority the current Kingdom of The Netherlands, as well as the rest of Europe and (most of) the World, legally operates under up to this day is none less than the Vatican, which gives us some very interesting possibilities to liberate the people of this planet from literally ages of (financial) tyranny under jurisdiction, authority, sovereignty and responsibility of the Vatican.

 

One of the most revealing clues on how to do this can be found in the Treaty of Paris of 1815 (also see this section below):

 

The Allied Powers having by their united efforts, and by the success of their arms, preserved France and Europe from the convulsions with which they were menaced by the late enterprise of Napoleon Bonaparte, and by the Revolutionary system reproduced in France, to promote its success;

 

What this says is basically that the French and thus Dutch and United States revolutions are a direct and severe threat to the Vatican's objectives and therefore a blessing to all freedom loving people on this planet, even though the whole French revolution may (initially) have been a kind of false flag operation along the lines set out by Prof. Veith. Either way, here is why these revolutions actually ARE a deadly weapon against the dark Cabal:

 

The essential trick for a nation to liberate itself, is to declare a bill of rights and a republican constitution by referendum under common law and under the authority of the people themselves, after the example that has been set in the late 1700s by all three mentioned republics. As far as I am aware, the US did not use a referendum, but the Dutch Batavian Republic definitely did. It may be possible to use some other process, but with a constitution ratified by the people of a nation by referendum there is no question about the legal validity nor authority of said constitution. In other words: NO ONE can legally prevent the people of a nation to declare their independence under common law.

 

What this does is that it establishes a new legal entity, a free and really independent Republic, under the jurisdiction of Common Law instead of under the jurisdiction of international civil law, which up to this day still operates under authority and sovereignty of the Vatican. In other words: you now have two DIFFERENT legal entities governing over one and the same country, of which only one is really free and independent and operates under the authority of the People now actually OWNING their land instead of legally STILL being a vassal of the Vatican. The latter STILL being the case for at least all previous colonies of the United Kingdom, France, The Netherlands and Spain as well as ALL of Europe and Russia.

 

The other side of this is that the legal entity that still exists as a vassal of the Vatican no longer has any subjects nor any possessions within the now liberated country, BUT it is still burdened with ALL of its obligations and liabilities established under the authority and responsibility of the Vatican. So, these are NOT the problem of the now liberated people, which were after all just subjects ruled under the sovereignty of the Vatican.

 

In other words: we now have not only a nice trick to liberate a nation, but also a convenient way to get rid of the problem of nation's debt, which is now the problem of the Vatican and not of the nation's self-liberated people.

How nice!

 

Read more: http://www.tuks.nl/wiki/index.php/Main/TheFascinatingHistoryOfCivilLawVe...

Comments

OBJECTIONS Re: The Fascinating History Of Civil Law

Paul Andrew Mitchell's picture
If the US removes the P2 fascist government run via the United States of America corporation, then all US external debts will not have to be paid by the American people. We are trying to bankrupt that war mongering and murdering corporation and their fascist overseers at the P2 Roman empire headquarters.
 
 
This same old lie -- that the Federal Government in the USAis a corporation -- has already been thoroughly refutedby verified evidence assembled by my office andfiled in Courts of competent jurisdiction.
 
First and foremost, the U.S. Supreme Court has already
ruled that the "United States" (Federal Government)
is NOT a corporation:  see U.S. v. Cooper Corporation
cited and quoted here:
 
 
"UNITED STATES OF AMERICA" did incorporate twice
in Delaware, but both corporations were later REVOKED
by the Delaware Secretary of State:
 
 
Neither registered to do business in any of the other 49 Statesof the Union, as far as we know (we've confirmed with a few SOS):
 
 
Even in New York State -- the heart of the The Conspiracy --neither registered to do business in that State:
 
 
Another impostor corporation was created with the
name of THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
(added "THE" at the front of the name):
 
 
... and this one turned up domiciled in Scotland:
 
 
 
If you are interested in the exact details of our refutations,
we got to the bottom of this "myth" here:
 
(filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals in Denver, Colorado)
 
 
Secondly, the United States (Federal Government) has now
properly and formerly declared insolvency with respect to
obligations allegedly owed to the Federal Reserve Banks:
 
(filed in a U.S. Bankruptcy Court, Eastern District of Washington)
 
So, both "legs" claiming authority for the Federal income taxhave now been legally CUT OFF:
 
(1)  there is no Statute at Large creating a specific liability
for taxes imposed by subtitle A of the Internal Revenue Code:
 
http://www.supremelaw.org/sls/2amjur2d.htm (see Commissioner v. Acker, in chief)
 
EVEN IF the IRS were a de jure service, bureau, office or
other subdivision of the U.S. Department of the Treasury --
which they decidedly are NOT -- they would STILL have
no authority to create a tax liability solely by means of
implementing Regulations published in the Federal Register.
 
 
(2)  the AUTOMATIC STAY authorized by 11 U.S.C. 362
has now been activated as a consequence of that
DECLARATION OF INSOLVENCY:
 
 
Consequently, the Federal Reserve Banks
and their collection agency, the IRS,
are now legally BARRED from collecting
any more Federal income taxes imposed
by subtitle A of the Internal Revenue Code.
 
 
Thirdly, the terms "admiralty and maritime"
in Article III of the Constitution are defined
in Bouvier's Law Dictionary to refer to
matters that arise on the high seas:
 
Section 2.   The judicial Power shall extend ...

-- to all Cases of admiralty and maritime jurisdiction
MARITIME. That which belongs to or is connected with the sea.

http://www.supremelaw.org/ref/dict/blda1.htm#admiralty



  ADMIRALTY. The name of a jurisdiction which takes cognizance of
suits or  actions which arise in consequence of acts done upon or
relating to the sea;  or, in other words, of all transactions and
proceedings relative  to commerce  and navigation, and to damages
or injuries upon the sea. 2 Gall. R. 468.
 
The term "sea" above does NOT refer in any manner
to the Vatican:  it refers to the large bodies of water
the separate major land masses on planet Earth.

As such, "admiralty and maritime" are subject matters
in American law;  they do NOT refer to any particular
kind of court. 

As such, there is no such thing as an "admiralty court"
under current American laws.  On the contrary,
certain Federal Courts have been given either original or
appellate jurisdiction over cases involving matters
arising on the high seas.


 

All Rights Reserved without Prejudice

Pope

Hwyone's picture

 

The man buried in the Vatican is not Simon, The Peter, but Simon, the Sorcerer (the false-peter). After being rebuked by the apostles by intending to buy the Holy Ghost gift, this unholy counterfeit then moved to Roma  where he founded a priestcraft denomination which later became the Roman church. He's a counterfeit of the Devil. See Acts 8:9-24 for more details.
 
Christian Media Network have publications about this. Read the "The Double Day" and "The Two Witnesses."