I believe in most of your approach on physics. However, you say that magnetism is same as gravity, the only difference is polarisation (negative vs positive).
I'd suggest saying that only magnetism exist and gravity doesn't. It's syntax differenece but sharper and less confusing. From Tevatron experiments we got to know that gravity is negligible(=0) in quantum mechanics. This means when one superimpose all particles together to get significant mass object, the gravity will be ZERO while excess of electrical force will be present. Gravity field has no independent existence/origin - it is purely a net excess mag or electrical field. Covalent, metallic, ionic bonding in "microcosm" has electrical nature - no talk about gravity there at all.
There is many individuals questioning over-unity. I suggest paying no attention to them.
Over unity is a theoretically (deductively) proven idea. People who question the issue usually can't do math calculations, don't know how to calculate B vector, inductance, can’t use numbers in Lentz and Faraday laws, can't handle or hate scientific maths, are lazy to seek data on gauges of wire used for coils or can't handle sci notations on permeability of metals and space. Doing the maths easily proves that over unity is a fact.
Conservation laws are right in many cases. There are (were) observed many exceptions of those laws. While we don't get 1kg mass converted alchemicaly to 2 kg mass, we get may instances (even on industrial scale) of 1watt input converted to 1.6 watt output. The conservation laws were formulated in too general form, they should've included list of conditions in which they would work and allow for exceptions. One of conditions that notoriously gets missed on is that gain of energy can be accomplished at 90 deg to plane of work.
Open ended approach could save anybody's soul from believing in hoax.
Newton’s second law reads:
… + input = output + dW
This allows to see why output can be bigger than input.
Comments
ANdReA love u, I'm Tarik
ANdReA love u, I'm Tarik Kece.
Love You Tarik!
Love You Tarik!
gravity vs magnetism
I believe in most of your approach on physics. However, you say that magnetism is same as gravity, the only difference is polarisation (negative vs positive).
I'd suggest saying that only magnetism exist and gravity doesn't. It's syntax differenece but sharper and less confusing. From Tevatron experiments we got to know that gravity is negligible(=0) in quantum mechanics. This means when one superimpose all particles together to get significant mass object, the gravity will be ZERO while excess of electrical force will be present. Gravity field has no independent existence/origin - it is purely a net excess mag or electrical field. Covalent, metallic, ionic bonding in "microcosm" has electrical nature - no talk about gravity there at all.
There is many individuals questioning over-unity. I suggest paying no attention to them.